Silver nanoparticle-enhanced photosensitizers

ABSTRACT

The present invention relates generally to compositions and methods of killing bacteria using a surface plasmon coupled to a photosensitizer. A nanostructure ( 10 ) may include a silver nanoparticle core ( 12 ), a mesoporous silica shell ( 14 ), and a photosensitizer ( 16 ). A method of killing bacteria may include contacting bacteria with a nanostructure ( 10 ) including a silver nanoparticle core ( 12 ), a mesoporous silica shell ( 14 ), and a photosensitizer ( 16 ) to form a blend and exposing the blend to light.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates generally to compositions and methods of killing bacteria and, more specifically, to compositions and methods of killing bacteria using a surface plasmon coupled to a photosensitizer.

BACKGROUND

Singlet oxygen plays a central role in many applications, such as photodynamic inactivation of microorganisms, photodynamic therapy of cancers, photoinduced oxidation, photodegradation of polymers, wastewater treatment, and fine chemical synthesis. Photodynamic inactivation (PDI) of bacteria has become an emerging and evolving strategy against infectious diseases, especially those related to multidrug resistance, because microorganisms do not appear to readily develop resistance toward PDI. In this regard, multidrug-resistant bacterial strains are shown to be killed by PDI as easily as their nave counterparts. During PDI and when the level of the reactive oxygen species (ROS) produced exceeds bacterial detoxification and repair capabilities, the ROS can damage intracellular DNA, RNA, proteins, lipids, and cytoplasmic membrane, which leads to bacteria death.

Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria differ in membrane permeability due to the difference in the outer membrane structures. Gram-positive bacteria can easily take up most neutral or anionic photosensitizers and be readily photoinactivated, which is not the case for Gram-negative bacteria. This difference has led the development of photosensitizers toward polycationic conjugates or cationic photosensitizers to facilitate uptake by the bacterial cells. Importantly, some studies have shown that singlet oxygen, when produced sufficiently close to the bacteria, can diffuse into the bacteria cells causing fatal damage to the cells. Accordingly, photosensitizers with enhanced singlet oxygen production efficiency are highly desired, regardless of their charge properties.

The ground electronic state of molecular oxygen is a spin triplet. Ground-state (triplet) oxygen is not very reactive. However, triplet oxygen can be activated by the addition of energy and transformed into reactive oxygen species. The two electronically excited singlet states are O₂(¹Δ_(g)) and O₂(¹Σ_(g) ⁺), at 94 and 157 kJ/mol above the ground state, respectively. The O₂(¹Σ_(g) ⁺) state has a rather short lifetime, due to the spin-allowed transition to the O₂(¹Δ_(g)) state. The O₂(¹Δ_(g)) state is commonly referred to as singlet oxygen. Singlet oxygen has a relatively long lifetime (e.g. 10⁻⁶ to 10⁻³ seconds in solution) because of the spin-forbidden transition to the triplet state O₂(³Σ_(g) ⁻). Singlet oxygen can be observed experimentally in the absorption and emission at about 1270 nm.

The most convenient method of singlet oxygen production is the photosensitization of sensitizing molecules in the presence of light and oxygen. Great progress has been made in identifying, designing and synthesizing molecules as efficient photosensitizers. Even noble metal nanostructures have demonstrated the capability of singlet oxygen production. Still, the ability of noble metal nanostructures to enhance the production of singlet oxygen has remained largely unexploited. Since singlet oxygen plays a very important role in cell damage, an abundant supply of singlet oxygen is required.

Photodynamic inactivation of bacteria, among other applications that utilize singlet oxygen, is currently limited by the insufficient generation of singlet oxygen while reacting with biological targets. Accordingly, improved compositions and methods of producing singlet oxygen are needed to address the shortcomings of existing methods. More particularly, new compositions and methods are needed that increase the efficiency of the production of singlet oxygen.

SUMMARY

In its broadest aspects, embodiments of the present invention are directed to plasmon-photosensitizer resonance coupling hybrids. In one embodiment, a nanostructure includes a silver nanoparticle core, a mesoporous silica shell, and a photosensitizer. The photosensitizer may be covalently bonded to said silver nanoparticle. Further, the photosensitizer may be adsorbed onto said mesoporous silica shell.

Additionally, embodiments of the present invention are generally directed to photodynamic inactivation of microorganisms using singlet oxygen generated from the plasmon-photosensitizer hybrids. In an exemplary embodiment, a method of killing bacteria includes contacting bacteria with a nanostructure including a silver nanoparticle core, a mesoporous silica shell, and a photosensitizer to form a blend and exposing said blend to light. The bacteria may be Gram-positive or Gram-negative bacteria. The light may have a broad spectrum, the broad spectrum including visible and near infrared wavelengths.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and, together with a general description of the invention given above, and the detailed description given below, serve to explain the invention.

FIG. 1 is a schematic representation of a nanostructure according to an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 2 illustrates a nanostructure according to an embodiment of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Embodiments of the present invention are directed to a surface plasmon-photosensitizer hybrid. Further embodiments of the present invention are directed to a method of killing bacteria that includes a surface plasmon-photosensitizer hybrid. The surface plasmon-photosensitizer hybrid includes metal nanoparticles, an inert porous layer, and a photosensitizer.

The core of the surface plasmon-photosensitizer hybrid consists of metal nanoparticles. The metal nanoparticles may be, for example, silver nanoparticles (AgNPs). The diameter of the AgNP core may be, for example, about 10 to 50 nm.

The metal nanoparticles may be coated with the inert porous layer, or shell, to create a nanostructure. The porous layer may be further considered to be mesoporous, meaning the layer includes pores having a diameter generally in the range of about 2 to 50 nm. The thickness of the resulting mesoporous SiO₂ shell may be, for example, about 10 to 100 nm.

The nanostructure may be subsequently coated with a photosensitizer. Embodiments of the present invention may include a variety of photosensitizers. By way of example and without limitation, the photosensitizer could include tris(2,2′-bipyridyl)dichlororuthenium(II) hexahydrate (RuBPy), rose bengal (RB), hematoporphyrin IX dihydrochloride (HPIX), meso-tetra(4-carboxyphenyl) porphine (TCPP), Cu(II) meso-tetra(4-carboxyphenyl) porphine (Cu-TCPP), meso-porphyrin IX (PIX), and riboflavin, the structures of which are shown below.

FIG. 1 shows a schematic representation of a surface plasmon-photosensitizer hybrid 10 having a metal nanoparticle core 12, a mesoporous shell 14, and a photosensitizer 16 that may be adsorbed in the mesopores 18 of the shell 14. The adsorption of the photosensitizer takes advantage of the enormous porosity and surface area of the mesoporous nanostructures. The mesopores in the inert shell are capable of hosting the photosensitizers and facilitate the interaction between the photosensitizers and the metal nanoparticles. The loading efficiency of the photosensitizer may vary based on differences in photosensitizer properties. Further, different photosensitizers may display different degrees of resonance coupling with AgNPs, depending on the overlap of the surface plasmon and the absorption spectra of the photosensitizers.

In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) may be prepared inside a mesoporous silica matrix to create silver-mesoporous silica core-shell nanoparticles (Ag@mSiO₂). More specifically, Ag@mSiO₂ nanoparticles may be synthesized by a facile method using, for example, silver nitrate as the precursor, formaldehyde as the reducing agent, cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) as the stabilizer and template, tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) as the silica source, and sodium hydroxide (NaOH) as the catalyst. Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the silver-mesoporous silica core-shell nanoparticles may be fabricated using other methods.

After synthesis, Ag@mSiO₂ nanoparticles may be dispersed in an aqueous solution under stirring. Next, a solution of a photosensitizer may be added and stirred for a suitable period of time. The products may then be centrifuged and washed to remove any unbound photosensitizers. Finally, the as-synthesized Ag@mSiO₂@photosensitizer hybrids may be dispersed into an aqueous solution under sonication. FIG. 2 is a TEM image of an exemplary spherical Ag@mSiO₂@photosensitizer hybrid with an average particle size of 47 nm.

In a typical singlet oxygen production process, a photosensitizer is excited to the excited singlet state and subsequently reaches the excited triplet state via intersystem crossing (ISC). When encountering ground state (triplet) molecular oxygen, energy transfer takes place between the excited triplet state of the photosensitizer and molecular oxygen, leading to the generation of singlet oxygen. Experimentally, the observed singlet oxygen phosphorescence intensity can be described by Equation (1):

I=γ _(ex)·φ_(ISC) ·P _(T) ^(O) ² ·S _(Δ)·φ_(p)·ε_(coll)

where γ_(ex) is the excitation rate, φ_(ISC) is the ISC efficiency of the photosensitizer, P_(T) ^(O) ² is the fraction of the triplet photosensitizers reacted with ground state oxygen, S_(Δ) is the efficiency of the interaction between triplet photosensitizers and ground state oxygen that results in the formation of singlet oxygen, φ_(p) is the phosphorescence emission quantum yield of the singlet oxygen, and ε_(coll) is the light collection efficiency of the instrument. Further, P_(T) ^(O) ² can be described by Equation (2):

$P_{T}^{O_{2}} = \frac{k_{q} \cdot \left\lbrack O_{2} \right\rbrack}{\tau^{- 1} + {k_{q} \cdot \left\lbrack O_{2} \right\rbrack}}$

where k_(q) is the rate constant of the triplet photosensitizer reacting with the ground state oxygen, [O₂] is the ground state oxygen concentration, and τ is the lifetime of triplet photosensitizer in the absence of oxygen.

Hybrids according to the present invention may generally demonstrate significant enhancement in singlet oxygen production, and thus in the observed singlet oxygen phosphorescence intensity, as compared to pure photosensitizers. This is due in part to the advantageous plasmon-molecular resonance coupling where the light-absorbing molecules near the metal nanoparticles exhibit strong absorption due to the localized surface plasmon. In other words, increased spectral overlap between the surface plasmon resonance spectrum of the silver core and the absorption spectra of the photosensitizer results in increased singlet oxygen production. Strong resonance coupling between the photosensitizers and silver core may increase the singlet oxygen production by up to three orders of magnitude.

The presence of AgNP in the vicinity of the photosensitizers has differing effects on the components of the observed singlet oxygen phosphorescence intensity (I). For example, the phosphorescence of the surface plasmon of the AgNP core, at about 403 nm, is far from the singlet oxygen phosphorescence of 1270 nm, which suggests little resonance between the surface plasmon and the singlet oxygen. Thus, it is expected that φ_(p) remains unchanged regardless of the presence of the AgNP core. Further, the light collection efficiency term, ε_(coll), is system-dependent and should be generally constant if the measurements are conducted under the same experimental settings. As will be described below, the presence of AgNP in the vicinity of the photosensitizers may enhance the other three variables in the photosensitization process—γ_(ex), P_(T) ^(O) ² , and S_(Δ).

The enhancement in the excitation rate of photosensitizers, γ_(ex), is possible in Ag@mSiO₂@photosensitizer hybrids where the photosensitizers are adsorbed into the mesopores with close proximity to the AgNP core. The excitation of the surface plasmon resonance can greatly enhance the local electromagnetic field near the surface of the AgNPs. With a good spectral overlap between the surface plasmon of AgNP and the absorption of the photosensitizer, the photosensitizers will experience an enhanced excitation, resulting in the increase of γ_(ex).

The fraction of the triplet photosensitizers reacted with ground state oxygen (P_(T) ^(O) ² ) may increase because the reaction of the excited hybrid with molecular oxygen occurs in the mesopores of the silica. The small volume of the pores results in increased collision frequency. The pores may have, for example, a mean diameter of 2.5 nm and a mean length of 17 nm.

Interaction between the excited triplet photosensitizer and ground state oxygen is essentially a triplet-triplet annihilation process with S_(Δ) being the efficiency. It has long been understood that triplet-triplet encounter complexes produce nine spin states of singlet, triplet, and quintet, with a statistical probability of 1/9, 3/9 and 5/9, respectively. The singlet channel is the only path leading to singlet oxygen. However, intersystem crossing among different spin states of the encounter complex is possible, which has been proposed to explain the quenching rate constant higher than 1/9 of the diffusion rate constant in the literature. In that regard, the presence of AgNPs could promote, through heavy atom effect, the intersystem crossing in the triplet-triplet encounter complex, leading to a higher probability toward the singlet channel and a higher S_(Δ).

Hybrids according to the present invention may have other advantageous properties associated with singlet oxygen production. Singlet oxygen production may increase linearly with the increased concentration of hybrids, indicating little self-quenching at higher concentrations. In contrast, singlet oxygen production does not linearly increase with the increased concentrations of pure photosensitizers, which indicates strong self-quenching at higher concentrations. Furthermore, hybrids may display good stability in singlet oxygen production over a long illumination time, with no decay in activity. Because of these advantageous properties, hybrids according to the present invention may be useful in more applications than pure photosensitizers.

The surface plasmon-photosensitizer hybrids may have new spectral characteristics as compared to pure photosensitizers. The hybrid state(s) formed by the surface plasmon-molecular resonance coupling may markedly affect the fluorescence of the photosensitizers. For example, there may be significant changes in the fluorescence emission and excitation spectra of the hybrids, both in intensity and shape. The high-energy Soret band (B-band) and the low-energy quasi-allowed band (Q-band) transitions in the excitation spectra may both decrease significantly. The emission bands may be broadened and weakened. Generally, as the concentrations of photosensitizer increase, the fluorescence intensities decrease due to severe self-quenching. In contrast, Ag@mSiO₂@photosensitizer hybrids may display only slight change both in fluorescence intensity and shape when the concentration increases as compared to the pure photosensitizer.

Another embodiment of the present invention includes a method of killing bacteria. Bacteria may be contacted with a surface plasmon-photosensitizer hybrid according to the present invention. Next, the bacteria and hybrid may be exposed to light causing the Ag@mSiO₂@photosensitizer hybrid to produce singlet oxygen, which results in photodynamic inactivation of the bacteria. Advantageously, the Ag@mSiO₂@photosensitizer hybrids may generally demonstrate significant enhancement in singlet oxygen production and an increased efficiency in the photodynamic inactivation of the bacteria. The highly improved PDI efficiency of the Ag@mSiO₂@photosensitizer hybrids may be understood in the following aspects. First, the adsorbed photosensitizers in the mesopores of silica matrix may result in a high local concentration (e.g. 1,600 photosensitizers per particle in Ag@mSiO₂@HPIX hybrids). Second, the surface plasmon-photosensitizer coupling may enhance the singlet oxygen production efficiency. Third, the locally generated singlet oxygen may reach a higher concentration than when free photosensitizers act individually, causing more damage to the bacteria. There are other advantages of using hybrids according to the present invention for PDI, in addition to the improved efficiency against broad-spectrum bacteria. For example, a non-coherent white light source may be used. Further, there is no incubation time required for the uptake of the hybrid by the bacteria. Moreover, using a hybrid may allow photosensitizers that are insoluble in water to be utilized in PDI applications.

In an exemplary embodiment, a culture of bacteria may be inoculated and mixed with a Ag@mSiO₂@photosensitizer hybrid. The bacteria may be, for example, Gram-positive or Gram-negative. The culture may then be illuminated with an appropriate fluence. Advantageously, the applied light may have a broad spectrum including, for example, visible and near infrared wavelengths. Some pure photosensitizers, such as Riboflavin, need visible light excitation to display a rather moderate antibacterial effect. Consequently, the spectral window of excitation may be broadened when using hybrids according to the present invention. As a result, a variety of light sources may be used in practice instead of light sources with specific wavelengths.

In order to facilitate a more complete understanding of the embodiments of the invention, the following non-limiting examples are provided.

Example 1 Synthesis of Ag@mSiO₂ Nanoparticles

Silver-mesoporous silica core-shell nanoparticles (Ag@mSiO₂) were synthesized by a facile method using silver nitrate as the precursor, formaldehyde as the reducing agent, CTAB as the stabilizer and template, TEOS as the silica source, and sodium hydroxide as the catalyst. In a typical run, 0.02 g of CTAB was dissolved in a solution containing 9.8 mL of water and 0.24 mL of 0.5 M NaOH. After stirring at 80° C. for 10 min, 0.06 mL of 1.0 M formaldehyde solution and 0.24 mL of 0.1 M silver nitrate aqueous solution were added. Then, 0.07 mL TEOS was added at a rate of 3 mL/h under stirring. After the reaction progressed at 80° C. under stirring for 2 h, the products were centrifuged and washed by ethanol. The surfactant template was removed by extraction in ethanol solution containing ammonium nitrate (6 g/L) at 50° C. for 30 min.

Synthesis of Ag@mSiO₂@Photosensitizer Hybrids.

The freshly synthesized Ag@mSiO₂ nanoparticles were dispersed in 10 mL aqueous solution under stirring. Then, 10 mL of a DMF solution of respective photosensitizer (1 mM) was added, and the solution was stirred at room temperature for 72 h. The photosensitizers used include tris(2,2′-bipyridyl)dichlororuthenium(II) hexahydrate (RuBPy), rose bengal (RB), hematoporphyrin IX dihydrochloride (HPIX), meso-tetra(4-carboxyphenyl) porphine (TCPP), Cu(II) meso-tetra(4-carboxyphenyl) porphine (Cu-TCPP), and meso-porphyrin IX (PIX). FIG. 2 illustrates the structures of these six photosensitizers. The products were centrifuged and washed by water and DMF three times to remove any unbound photosensitizers. Finally, the synthesized Ag@mSiO₂@photosensitizer hybrids were dispersed into 10 mL aqueous solution under sonication to be used as stock solutions.

Loading Efficiency and Zeta Potential Measurements.

The loading efficiencies of the photosensitizers in the hybrids were determined by UV-Vis absorption. As previously discussed, the loading efficiencies of the six photosensitizers into the mesoporous silica pores differ due to the diverse molecular structures. TCPP, Cu-TCPP and PIX had higher loading efficiencies of 140.7 μg/mg, 260.5 μg/mg, and 750 μg/mg, respectively; while HPIX, RuBPy and RB had lower loading efficiencies of 27.4 μg/mg, 28.3 μg/mg, and 33.6 μg/mg, respectively. Zeta potential measurements were carried out to further investigate the surface properties of the hybrids. The zeta potential of the initial Ag@mSiO₂ core-shell nanoparticles was −26.44 mV. The zeta potentials of the hybrids containing HPIX, TCPP, Cu-TCPP, PIX, RuBPy, and RB are −25.65 mV, −35.46 mV, −36.45 mV, −35.39 mV, −5.8 mV, and −31.78 mV, respectively. The results show that the presence of the adsorbed photosensitizers had only moderate effect on the zeta potential of the Ag@mSiO₂ nanoparticles, except for RuBPy.

Silver Ion Release Measurements.

A dispersion of Ag@mSiO₂ nanoparticles (about 1.1 mg/mL) was prepared in diluted HNO₃ solution (pH 4.0), which can accelerate the oxidation of AgNPs under the ambient conditions and the release of Ag⁺ into solution. The solution was exposed to air for 5 days, and one sample was collected each day. The released Ag⁺ concentration of each sample was measured by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS).

Fluorescence and Phosphorescence Measurements.

A QM-40 spectrofluorometer (PTI Inc.) equipped with a high performance InGaAs photodiode and a lock-in amplifier (MODEL 410 single phase, Scitec Instruments Ltd.) was used to measure the fluorescence and phosphorescence spectra and lifetimes. Detection of the singlet oxygen production was carried out by monitoring its phosphorescence emission at about 1270 nm. The light source was a Xenon arc lamp, the output of which passed through an optical chopper operating at a fixed frequency. Samples were loaded into a quartz cuvette and placed in a light-tight chamber, with the emission signal collected orthogonal to the excitation beam. An additional long-pass filter (850 nm cut-off) was used to remove any possible higher-order artifact signals. Samples were dispersed in DI water for testing. To remove the silver core from the Ag@mSiO₂@photosensitizer hybrids, an excess amount of sodium cyanide (0.1 M) was added, which itself would not affect the photosensitizers adsorbed into the mesoporous silica. All fluorescence, phosphorescence, and lifetime measurements of Ag@mSiO₂@photosensitizer hybrids were carried out on the same instrument. All photosensitizers were dissolved in PBS buffer solution (pH 7.4) before spectral measurement. The excitation wavelengths for fluorescence and singlet oxygen production are 403 nm, 400 nm, 400 nm, 393 nm, 460 nm, and 550 nm for HPIX, TCPP, Cu-TCPP, PIX, RuBPy, and RB, respectively. The emission bands center at 620 nm, 650 nm, 650 nm, 617 nm, 615 nm, and 576 nm, for HPIX, TCPP, Cu-TCPP, PIX, RuBPy, and RB, respectively.

Photodynamic Inactivation Assays.

Typically, overnight cultures of Staphylococcus epidermidis (ATCC 35984), Escherichia coli (ATCC 35218), and Acinetobacter baumannii (ATCC 19606) were inoculated into PBS buffer solution (pH=7.4) and mixed with a series of concentrations of Ag@mSiO₂@HPIX hybrid, HPIX (dissolved in the same PBS buffer solution), or Ag@mSiO₂ nanoparticles. All bacterial suspensions (200 μL) were then placed in the wells of 96-well plates. The final cell concentration of the suspensions was between about 10⁶ and 10⁷ colony-forming units per mL (CFU/mL). The wells were illuminated with different fluences. After illumination, a plate count was performed. Bacterial viability was determined by a modified version of the Miles and Misra method.

The suspensions were serially 10-fold diluted with PBS. Then, drops of 10 μL of each dilution were applied onto MH II agar plates. Plates were streaked in triplicate and incubated for 18-24 h at 37° C. in the dark before counting. A non-coherent, white light source with interchangeable fiber bundle (model LC-122, LumaCare) was used in all photoinactivation experiments. The irradiance at the position of the samples was kept at 300 mW/cm², as measured by a laser power meter (Model 840011, SPER Scientific).

Characterization.

The morphology of the Ag@mSiO₂@photosensitizer hybrids was characterized by a Phillips Biotwin 12 transmission electron microscope (FEI). TEM samples were prepared by directly applying 10 μL of the sample ethanol solution onto a carbon-coated copper grid (300 mesh, EMS) and left to dry at room temperature. UV-Vis absorption spectra were measured using a UV-Vis spectrometer (USB4000-ISS, Ocean Optics). The loading efficiency of photosensitizers was determined by measuring the photosensitizers in the supernatant after centrifugation via UV-Vis absorption spectra. The Ag⁺ concentration was measured by a triple quadruple ICP-MS (ICP-QQQ, Agilent Technologies).

Data Analysis and Statistics.

Each experiment was performed at least in triplicate. The primary data are presented as the means with standard deviations of the mean. Differences are analyzed for statistical significance by the two-sample Student's t-test and the probability values of less than 5% are considered significant.

Ag@mSiO₂@photosensitizer Hybrid Resonance Coupling. The resonance coupling between the photosensitizers and the AgNPs core in the Ag@mSiO₂@photosensitizer hybrids was determined. The UV-Vis absorption spectra of all Ag@mSiO₂@photosensitizer hybrids were measured. The surface plasmon peak positions in the Ag@mSiO₂@photosensitizer hybrids are slightly red-shifted, compared to that of the Ag@mSiO₂ nanoparticles at about 403 nm. Different photosensitizers displayed different degrees of resonance coupling with AgNPs depending on the overlap of the surface plasmon and the absorption spectra of the photosensitizers. For example, HPIX, TCPP, Cu-TCPP, PIX, and RuBPy had stronger resonance coupling with the AgNPs core than RB.

Ag@mSiO₂@Photosensitizer Hybrid Spectral Characteristics.

As discussed above, plasmonic-molecular resonance coupling may form hybrid state(s) with new spectral characteristics. To this end, the fluorescence emission and excitation spectra of the Ag@mSiO₂@photosensitizer hybrids and the respective pure photosensitizer were measured. In the case of TCPP, Cu-TCPP, PIX, and HPIX, all common porphyrin derivatives, the Ag@mSiO₂@photosensitizer hybrids displayed strong resonance coupling. There were significant changes in the fluorescence emission and excitation spectra of the hybrids, both in intensity and shape. The high-energy Soret band (B-band) and the low-energy quasi-allowed band (Q-band) transitions in the excitation spectra both decreased significantly. The emission bands were broadened and markedly weakened. As the concentrations of photosensitizer increased, the fluorescence intensities decreased greatly due to severe self-quenching. In contrast, Ag@mSiO₂@Cu-TCPP displayed only a slight change both in intensity and shape as compared to pure Cu-TCPP. The low fluorescence intensity of pure Cu-TCPP is probably due to the paramagnetic nature of the central copper (II). In the case of RuBPy and RB, the hybrids showed little change in fluorescence emission and excitation spectra, except the quenching increases with the increase of the photosensitizer concentration. Based on the spectra of these six Ag@mSiO₂@photosensitizer hybrids, the hybrid state(s) formed by the surface plasmon-molecular resonance coupling is considered to markedly affect the fluorescence of the photosensitizers.

Ag@mSiO₂@Photosensitizer Hybrid Time-Resolved Photoluminescence.

The time-resolved photoluminescence of the pure photosensitizers and the Ag@mSiO₂@photosensitizer hybrids were measured. Results are shown in Table 1, where T_(n) is amplitude-weighted lifetime and α_(n) is amplitude. In all cases except Cu-TCPP and RuBPy, the lifetimes of the photosensitizers were greatly reduced by the presence of the hybrid state(s), indicating the energy transfer from the excited states of photosensitizers to the AgNPs core. In the case of Cu-TCPP, the lifetime of the hybrid did not differ much from that of pure Cu-TCPP, because the lifetime of Cu-TCPP is already short due to the paramagnetic copper (II). For the Ag@mSiO₂@RuBPy hybrid, the effect on lifetime was insignificant.

Ag@mSiO₂@Photosensitizer Hybrid Singlet Oxygen Production.

Singlet oxygen production from the Ag@mSiO₂@photosensitizer hybrids, the corresponding photosensitizers, and Ag@mSiO₂ nanoparticles, respectively, were measured and calculated to determine any enhancement of singlet oxygen from the hybrids. The singlet oxygen enhancement factor (EF) is defined by Equation (3):

${EF} = \frac{\left( {I_{h} - I_{p} - I_{Ag}} \right)}{I_{p}}$

where I_(h), I_(p), and I_(Ag) are the singlet oxygen emission intensity of the hybrids, the pure photosensitizers, and AgNPs, respectively. The results showed that hybrids generally demonstrated significant enhancement in singlet oxygen production. The HPIX, TCPP, Cu-TCPP, PIX, and RuBPy hybrids displayed enhanced production of singlet oxygen by up to three orders of magnitude, as compared to the corresponding pure photosensitizers. The only hybrid that did not display enhanced production of singlet oxygen was Ag@mSiO₂@RB, most likely because of the weak resonance coupling between RB and AgNPs. The results also show that Ag@mSiO₂ nanoparticles themselves can produce some singlet oxygen due to the AgNP core.

Photodynamic Inactivation of Bacteria.

The Ag@mSiO₂@photosensitizer hybrids demonstrated very good efficiency in photodynamic inactivation of broad-spectrum bacteria. Ag@mSiO₂@HPIX was used as a model system in the PDI study. Ag@mSiO₂@HPIX was first tested with S. epidermidis, a Gram-positive bacterium. The bacterial culture was mixed with a series of Ag@mSiO₂@HPIX hybrids in which the adsorbed HPIX concentration was from 0.125 to 2 μM. The culture and hybrid were immediately irradiated with 40 J/cm² of white light. There was a dramatic difference in the lethality against S. epidermidis among the hybrid, pure HPIX of same concentration, and Ag@mSiO₂ nanoparticles. For the hybrid having an adsorbed HPIX concentration of 2 μM, bacterial killing of about 6-log was observed. For comparison, pure HPIX and Ag@mSiO₂ nanoparticles displayed less than 1-log bacterial killing under the same conditions. The enhancement in the bacterial killing efficiency can be quantified by Equation (4):

log₁₀(Enhancement Killing)=log₁₀(Hybrid Killing)−log₁₀(Photosensitizer Killing)−log₁₀(AgNPs Killing)

For S. epidermidis, the Ag@mSiO₂@HPIX hybrid displayed an enhancement in bacterial killing efficiency of 5-log when the concentration of the adsorbed HPIX was 2 μM. Parallel experiments conducted without light illumination showed negligible antibacterial effect of the hybrid, as well as pure HPIX and Ag@mSiO₂ nanoparticles. While Ag ions in the Ag@mSiO₂ nanoparticles can be slowly released into the solution, as shown in our measurements, the antibacterial effect of the released Ag ions appears to be insignificant considering that there is little incubation time after the hybrid is mixed with the bacteria. These results show the synergistic effect of the Ag@mSiO₂@photosensitizer hybrids in the PDI against S. epidermidis.

The antibacterial effects of the hybrids were also tested against two Gram-negative bacteria, E. coli and A. baumannii, the latter being a drug-resistant pathogen. The effects of the Ag@mSiO₂@HPIX hybrid against E. coli and A. baumannii were similar to those against S. epidermidis. While Ag@mSiO₂ nanoparticles exhibited some bacterial killing under a relatively high fluence, the hybrid displayed a higher PDI efficiency than pure HPIX and Ag@mSiO₂ nanoparticles. E. coli was mixed with the hybrid having an adsorbed HPIX concentration of 1 μM and exposed to a fluence of 400 J/cm². This resulted in the complete eradiation of the bacteria and an enhancement in bacterial killing of up to 4-log. In the case of A. baumannii, the same hybrid may completely eradiate bacteria under a fluence of 200 J/cm², again with an enhancement in bacterial killing of up to 4-log. These results demonstrate that the Ag@mSiO₂@photosensitizer hybrids display synergistic effect in bacterial killing against broad-spectrum bacteria.

Example 2 Synthesis of Ag@mSiO₂@Photosensitizer Hybrids

Ag@mSiO₂@HPIX and Ag@mSiO₂@Riboflavin hybrids were synthesized according to the method used in Example 1.

Photodynamic Inactivation Assays.

Cultures of S. epidermidis, E. coli, and A. baumannii were inoculated and mixed with a series of concentrations of Ag@mSiO₂@HPIX hybrid, HPIX (dissolved in the same PBS buffer solution), or Ag@mSiO₂ nanoparticles according to the method in Example 1. PDI assays were conducted on the bacteria and hybrids according to the method used in Example 1. Dark controls were run in parallel. Three independent runs were carried out for each experiment. Different optical filters were used to select the wavelength range of the illumination.

Characterization.

The morphology of the Ag@mSiO₂@photosensitizer hybrids, UV-Vis absorption spectra, and loading efficiency of photosensitizers were measured according to the method in Example 1.

Data Analysis and Statistics.

Each experiment was performed at least in triplicate. The primary data are presented as the means with standard deviations. Differences are analyzed for statistical significance by the two-sample t-test and the probability values of <5% are considered significant.

Photodynamic Inactivation of Bacteria.

The Ag@mSiO₂@photosensitizer hybrids demonstrated very good efficiency in broad-spectrum photodynamic inactivation of bacteria. Ag@mSiO₂@HPIX was used as a model system in the PDI study. Ag@mSiO₂@HPIX was first tested against Staphylococcus epidermidis (ATCC 35984), a Gram-positive bacterium. The bacterial culture was mixed with a series of Ag@mSiO₂@HPIX hybrids in which the adsorbed HPIX concentration was from 0.125 to 2 μM. The mixtures were immediately irradiated with 40 J/cm² of white light. There was a dramatic difference in the lethality against S. epidermidis among the hybrid, pure HPIX of same concentration, and Ag@mSiO₂ nanoparticles. For the hybrid, bacterial killing of about 6-log was observed when the adsorbed HPIX concentration in the hybrid was 2 μM. For comparison, pure HPIX and Ag@mSiO₂ nanoparticles displayed less than 1-log bacterial killing under the same conditions. For S. epidermidis, the Ag@mSiO₂@HPIX hybrid displayed an enhancement in bacterial killing efficacy of 5-log when the adsorbed HPIX concentration was 2 μM. Parallel experiments conducted without light illumination show negligible antibacterial effect of the hybrid, pure HPIX, and the Ag@mSiO₂ nanoparticles. While Ag ions in the Ag@mSiO₂ nanoparticles can be slowly released into the solution, the antibacterial effect of the released Ag ions appears to be insignificant considering that there is little incubation time after the hybrid is mixed with the bacteria. These results demonstrate the synergistic effect of Ag@mSiO₂@photosensitizer hybrids in the PDI against S. epidermidis.

The antibacterial effect of the hybrids was also tested against two Gram-negative bacteria, E. coli and A. baumannii, the latter being a drug-resistant pathogen. Both fluence-dependence and concentration-dependence experiments were carried out to illustrate the PDI efficiency of the hybrids. The killing efficacy of the Ag@mSiO₂@HPIX hybrid against E. coli and A. baumannii was similar to that against S. epidermidis. While Ag@mSiO₂ nanoparticles exhibited some bacterial killing under relatively high fluence, the hybrid displayed a higher PDI efficiency than pure HPIX and Ag@mSiO₂ nanoparticles. For E. coli, the hybrid with an adsorbed HPIX concentration of 1 μM and under fluence of 400 J/cm² resulted in the complete eradiation of the bacterium and an enhancement in bacterial killing of up to 4-log. In the case of A. baumannii, the same hybrid can completely eradiate the bacterium under fluence of 200 J/cm², again with an enhancement in bacterial killing of up to 4-log. These results demonstrate the synergistic effect of Ag@mSiO₂@photosensitizer hybrids in killing both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.

The killing efficacy of the Ag@mSiO₂@Riboflavin hybrid against Staphylococcus epidermidis, Escherichia coli and Acinetobacter baumannii under visible light and near-infrared irradiations was measured. The pure photosensitizer, Riboflavin, needs visible light excitation to display rather moderate antibacterial effect. In great contrast, the Ag@mSiO₂@Riboflavin hybrid demonstrates high efficacy in inactivating bacteria under both visible light and near-infrared light irradiations. The results demonstrate a broadening of the spectral window of excitation.

While all of the invention has been illustrated by a description of various embodiments and while these embodiments have been described in considerable detail, it is not the intention of the Applicants to restrict or in any way limit the scope of the appended claims to such detail. Additional advantages and modifications will readily appear to those skilled in the art. The invention in its broader aspects is therefore not limited to the specific details, representative apparatus and method, and illustrative examples shown and described. Accordingly, departures may be made from such details without departing from the spirit or scope of the Applicants' general inventive concept. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A nanostructure comprising: a silver nanoparticle core; a mesoporous silica shell; and a photosensitizer.
 2. The nanostructure claimed in claim 1, wherein said photosensitizer is covalently bonded to said silver nanoparticle.
 3. The nanostructure claimed in claim 1, wherein said photosensitizer is adsorbed onto said mesoporous silica shell.
 4. The nanostructure claimed in claim 1, wherein said photosensitizer is selected from the group consisting of hematoporphyrin, TCPP, PPIX, rose Bengal, erysthrosin B, Ru(bpy)3, Riboflavin, and Hemin.
 5. A method of killing bacteria comprising: contacting bacteria with a nanostructure comprising a silver nanoparticle core, a mesoporous silica shell, and a photosensitizer to form a blend; and exposing said blend to light.
 6. The method claimed in claim 5, wherein said bacteria is Gram-positive bacteria.
 7. The method claimed in claim 5, wherein said bacteria is Gram-negative bacteria.
 8. The method claimed in claim 5, wherein said light has a broad spectrum, the broad spectrum including visible and near infrared wavelengths. 